Author
Listed:
- Eduardo Anselmo De Castro
- João Marques
- Miguel Viegas
Abstract
Shumpeter characterised the innovative role of the entrepreneur on economic growth (Schumpeter, 1942). By inventing new products, new processes or techniques, the entrepreneur searches for monopoly rents and forces the social and economic structure to evolve. The routines, characterised by accommodative behaviour, which may endure for long periods are suddenly broken, in a sequence of stagnation and evolutionary periods (Schumpeter, 1947). Therefore, according to the Schumpeter theory, innovation is at the core of economic growth, and goes further as it causes social and economic structural changes. The present article leads on with an empirical assessment about the Schumpeter creative destruction hypothesis at the Portuguese Regional level, using a spatial econometric framework, based on Elhorst (2003) and Bhattacharjee et al. (2012). We estimate a model with spatial fixed effect, exploring the relation between R%D intensity at the firm level, productivity and firm demography dynamics, using a panel data for the 28 Portuguese continental NUTsIII regions between 2006 and 2009. The results obtained confirm the association between productivity and firm demographic dynamics - i.e., regions with higher level of productivity present also higher rates of birth and mortality among firms. We have not found, as it would be predictable according to the Schumpeter hypothesis, statistical evidence of association between productivity and R%D intensity at the firm level. This result indicates that Portuguese firms behaviour is more of imitation rather than innovation.
Suggested Citation
Eduardo Anselmo De Castro & João Marques & Miguel Viegas, 2018.
"The Schumpeter creative destruction hypothesis: a spatial assessment on Portuguese regions,"
Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 198-212.
Handle:
RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:2:p:198-212
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:2:p:198-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.