IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v19y2017i5p570-591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross border acquisitions and R%D activities: a comparative study in the Italian red biotech industry

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Matarazzo
  • Biagio Merola
  • Riccardo Resciniti

Abstract

In fast growing markets, technology-grafting acquisitions provide rapid and exclusive access to technologies and capabilities of the acquired firm. This paper focuses on the impact of cross border acquisitions on R%D activities of the target firms in order to answer these research questions: are these firms in the post-acquisition stage more innovative? What are the main reasons? Four Red biotech acquired companies are used as multiple case study. Results suggest that the target companies take advantage of the acquisition in terms of: a boost to their R%D activities; R%D synergies with the buyer; developments of their research and growth in sales worldwide. Managers may benefit from a mutual exchange of knowledge and competences between acquired firms and MNEs. Policy makers should encourage FDI attraction strategies. This study for the first time analyses the post-acquisition innovation performance of all the Italian acquired mid-sized firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Matarazzo & Biagio Merola & Riccardo Resciniti, 2017. "Cross border acquisitions and R%D activities: a comparative study in the Italian red biotech industry," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(5), pages 570-591.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:5:p:570-591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86605
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:19:y:2017:i:5:p:570-591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.