IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ricardian equivalence and super exogeneity: a new approach


  • László Kónya
  • Bekzod Abdullaev


In response to the 2008-2009 global financial crisis (GFC), several governments across the world, including Australia, made frenzied efforts to stimulate their economies by increasing spending and accumulating huge deficits. While the effects of stimulus packages are yet to be revealed, the fiscal measures can be effective only if the consumers are non-Ricardian. For this reason, Abdullaev and Kónya (2010, 2012) test the Ricardian equivalence (RE) hypothesis for Australia over the periods 1901-1974 and 1901-2007 on the basis of traditional and Euler-type consumption functions and conclude that it is unlikely to hold. The objective of this paper is to present further evidence to support this conclusion by adapting the novel approach of Sachsida and Teixeira (2000) for the first time. This procedure builds on the links between RE and the Lucas critique and between the Lucas critique and super exogeneity. Our results indicate that government debt is not super exogenous in the conditional model for domestic savings and henceforth RE does not hold in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • László Kónya & Bekzod Abdullaev, 2014. "Ricardian equivalence and super exogeneity: a new approach," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 87-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:87-99

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Aleksander Aristovnik & Matevž Meze, 2017. "The impact of supranational fiscal rules on public finance: the case of EMU member states," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 38-53.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:87-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmel O'Grady) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Carmel O'Grady to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.