IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v16y2014i1p60-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian manufacturing exports to ASEAN: linking country, customer and enterprise risk in method of payment choice

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Bergami

Abstract

In international trade transactions one of the primary concerns of exporters is payment for goods sold to foreign buyers. Country risk and customer risk are two components of the exporter's overall credit risk. One effective means of reducing these risks is through the choice of an appropriate method of payment. There are four traditional methods of payment: prepayment; letter of credit (L/C); bill of exchange; and open account. It is commonly accepted that L/C provide the most secure method of payment, where the buyer's credit risk is substituted with that of their bank. The L/C issuing bank provides a conditional guarantee of payment that relies on the presentation of specified data contents on identified documents, to trigger payment. Focusing on firms' internal processes and based on data gathered from voluntary survey and semi-structured interviews, this paper discusses how Australian manufacturers exporting to ASEAN determine the method of payment of choice, and to what degree L/C are used, in the context of country risk and customer risk assessment. The paper concludes that most firms have a potentially higher risk exposure as, in the majority of cases, enterprise risk management principles are not adopted in the choice of a method of payment.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Bergami, 2014. "Australian manufacturing exports to ASEAN: linking country, customer and enterprise risk in method of payment choice," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 60-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:60-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=58077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:60-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.