IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v14y2012i3p226-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of work sampling and feedback on individuals' work- and safety-related behaviour prior to, during, and after observer presence

Author

Listed:
  • Angela R. Lebbon
  • Jón G. Sigurjónsson
  • John Austin

Abstract

Work sampling has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for supervisors to motivate and enhance subordinates' work and safety performance. However, the effectiveness of work sampling has been questioned due to data being derived solely from direct observation when supervisors are present. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the effects of observer presence over several weeks on individuals' work- and safety-related behaviour prior to, during, and after direct observation. Additionally, this study will attempt to determine if feedback facilitates performance improvements prior to, during, and after observation. Results from this study suggest that work sampling and feedback are beneficial in improving work- and safety-related behaviour, yet, those improvements do not sustain beyond observation periods. These findings have implications for researchers and managers searching for techniques to improve employee performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela R. Lebbon & Jón G. Sigurjónsson & John Austin, 2012. "The effects of work sampling and feedback on individuals' work- and safety-related behaviour prior to, during, and after observer presence," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 226-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:226-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47806
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:226-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.