IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v13y2011i3-4p222-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A structural equations approach to assessing alternative service quality metrics within an extended service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty model

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelos Tsoukatos
  • Maria Koulentaki

Abstract

This study contributes to the setting/industry specific metrics vs. the SERVQUAL metric debate. It also revisits the causality of relationships between customer loyalty dimensions and the effects of customer satisfaction on the latter. Evidence drawn from Greek banking, was analysed under a structural equations approach. Though generic, SERVQUAL was found to outperform all other metrics in terms of both grasping the particularities of the research setting and reflecting service quality's effects. The banking specific BANQUAL-R and BSQ metrics failed in all above respects. SERVQUAL is capable of providing reliable service quality measurement in banking. Proposed industry specific metrics should be used with extreme caution. Customer satisfaction's effects among loyalty's dimensions were found unequal. The causality of relationships between loyalty dimensions runs from word-of-mouth to business extension passing through business retention. Customer satisfaction campaigns should better be targeted at attitudinal rather than behavioural loyalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelos Tsoukatos & Maria Koulentaki, 2011. "A structural equations approach to assessing alternative service quality metrics within an extended service quality, customer satisfaction, customer loyalty model," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3/4), pages 222-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:13:y:2011:i:3/4:p:222-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41850
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:13:y:2011:i:3/4:p:222-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.