IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v8y2014i5p646-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the performance sensitivity of replenishment systems using tradeoff curves

Author

Listed:
  • Chandandeep S. Grewal
  • S.T. Enns
  • Paul Rogers

Abstract

There are a number of studies in the literature where replenishment systems have been compared on the basis of mean performance. However, little attention has focused on comparing systems on the basis of sensitivity to changes in the supply chain environment. This study compares the performance sensitivity of reorder point (ROP) and Kanban replenishment systems in a capacitated supply chain using an optimum-seeking simulation approach. Changes in the supply chain environment include transit time variability, transporter frequency, demand rates and lot setup times. Performance tradeoff curves, showing the interaction of inventory and delivery performance, are generated and an index based on the areas under the tradeoff curves is proposed to quantify the performance sensitivity. It is found that the Kanban system is generally less sensitive, in part because it operates optimally at a lower utilisation level. It is also observed that performance sensitivity depends on the environmental factor that is perturbed. [Received 29 August 2011; Revised 12 June 2012; Revised 16 April 2013; Accepted 4 June 2013]

Suggested Citation

  • Chandandeep S. Grewal & S.T. Enns & Paul Rogers, 2014. "Measuring the performance sensitivity of replenishment systems using tradeoff curves," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5), pages 646-668.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:5:p:646-668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:5:p:646-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.