IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v8y2014i3p388-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision support system for maintenance benchmarking in big buildings

Author

Listed:
  • María Carmen Carnero

Abstract

Maintenance has not traditionally been considered an important factor in the firm's productivity and competitiveness - until the past decade at least - so this function offers organisations considerable potential for improvement. The use of benchmarking in maintenance could consequently help firms gain a competitive advantage. This article presents a decision support system that uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP and utility functions to carry out competitive and generic benchmarking in big buildings. Using data on the state of maintenance in firms in the big buildings sector and in firms with more than 500 employees in other industrial sectors in Spain, the author built discrete probability distributions for each criterion evaluated and each industrial sector analysed. All the information available from the sector is used in the comparisons rather than mean values. The decision support system is tested in two big buildings: a hospital and a department store. [Received 6 April 2012; Revised 25 February 2013; Revised 12 June 2013; Accepted 28 July 2013]

Suggested Citation

  • María Carmen Carnero, 2014. "A decision support system for maintenance benchmarking in big buildings," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 388-420.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:388-420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=61064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:8:y:2014:i:3:p:388-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.