IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v6y2012i3p281-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of a simulation, a hybrid Taguchi, and dual response surface methods in the automated material handling system tool-to-tool strategy for a 300-mm fab

Author

Listed:
  • Taho Yang
  • Yu-An Shen
  • Chiwoon Cho
  • Yu-Ru Lin

Abstract

With the increase in the size and weight of 300-mm wafers, manual handling has become difficult and automated material handling systems (AMHS) are necessary. The 300-mm fab requires only one type of vehicle and rail to connect all of the process resources, allowing vehicles to travel directly between intrabay and interbay systems. This type of transportation is a direct tool-to-tool transportation strategy. This paper aims to analyse the impact of direct tool-to-tool transportation. The present study used a discrete-event simulation to create a 300-mm semiconductor manufacturing flow and executed a factorial experiment of three factors based on uniform design, including the direct ratio, the stocker capacity and the number of machine load ports. Finally, using the dual-response surface method, the most important of the three factors and the best performance were determined. The results show promise for the proposed tool-to-tool transportation strategy in solving a practical application. [Received: 9 February 2010; Revised: 6 October 2010; Accepted: 17 November 2010]

Suggested Citation

  • Taho Yang & Yu-An Shen & Chiwoon Cho & Yu-Ru Lin, 2012. "The use of a simulation, a hybrid Taguchi, and dual response surface methods in the automated material handling system tool-to-tool strategy for a 300-mm fab," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 281-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:281-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46665
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:6:y:2012:i:3:p:281-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.