IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v20y2025i2p157-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing an enhanced acceptance sampling strategy with the process loss index

Author

Listed:
  • Armin Darmawan
  • Chien-Wei Wu

Abstract

To reconcile the differences between loose and stringent models and address product specifications sensitive to target value variations, a process loss index Le was introduced. This index assesses process capability by incorporating the concept of the quality loss function. Some researchers have integrated this index into variables sampling plans. In particular, Repetitive Group Sampling Plans (RGSP) offer cost advantages over single sampling plans, but their infinite sampling nature might lead to inefficiencies. To address this, our study introduces a modified RGSP with an adjustable lot disposition mechanism based on the process loss index. We establish an optimisation model to minimise the anticipated number of sample items, considering quality and risk constraints. Performance is compared to conventional methods using metrics such as average sample number, operating characteristic curve, and average run length. Ultimately, a practical demonstration is provided through an example to illustrate and validate the feasibility of the proposed plan. [Submitted: 22 January 2024; Accepted: 17 May 2024]

Suggested Citation

  • Armin Darmawan & Chien-Wei Wu, 2025. "Designing an enhanced acceptance sampling strategy with the process loss index," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 157-182.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:157-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=147830
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:20:y:2025:i:2:p:157-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.