IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v11y2017i2p205-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of grey-based Taguchi method and principal component analysis for multi-response decision-making in Kansei engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Sugoro Bhakti Sutono
  • Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid
  • Zahari Taha
  • Subagyo
  • Hideki Aoyama

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid method to determine the optimum combination of product form features in Kansei engineering. This method integrates the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis (GRA) coupled with principal component analysis (PCA). Experiments are performed on a variety of passenger car form designs. The Taguchi's L27 OA is chosen to design the experiments and to generate the car silhouettes as design samples. GRA is used to solve the multi-response optimisation problem, while PCA is used to assign the weighting values of relevant Kansei responses. The results show that the hybrid method was able to solve the complexity trade-off encountered in the decision-making process of multi-response optimisation using an economical and effective experimental design method. The method also has the capability in determining the optimum combination of product form features and generating an optimised car form design which accommodates the multi-Kansei need of consumers in a systematic manner. [Submitted: 28 June 2014 ; Revised 5 March 2016; Accepted: 28 September 2016]

Suggested Citation

  • Sugoro Bhakti Sutono & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Zahari Taha & Subagyo & Hideki Aoyama, 2017. "Integration of grey-based Taguchi method and principal component analysis for multi-response decision-making in Kansei engineering," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 205-227.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:205-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:205-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.