IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/eujine/v10y2016i4p479-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated simulation with design on experiment approach for shop floor improvement solution selections

Author

Listed:
  • Shye-Nee Low
  • Shahrul Kamaruddin
  • Ishak bin Haji Abdul Azid

Abstract

This paper highlights the decision process of evaluating and selecting shop floor improvement solution by integrating design of experiment (DOE) in a discrete event simulation (DES) environment. In this study, the approach is tested and verified using an improvement project of a case study. The simulated data from the basic simulation model were verified by comparing with the current production data of real scenarios through statistical t-test. Once it been verified, the basic simulation model were then only been modified according to the various proposed improvement solution. The most promising improvement solutions suggested reducing the 20% number of operators while increasing the 21.86% utilisation of operators in the system. Findings from the paper indicate that simulation with the DOE method can be used to assist in decision-making regarding the improvement alternatives of production system. It was useful in achieving continuous improvement in the manufacturing industry. [Received 28 April 2013; Revised 1 October 2013; Revised 10 January 2016; Accepted 16 February 2016]

Suggested Citation

  • Shye-Nee Low & Shahrul Kamaruddin & Ishak bin Haji Abdul Azid, 2016. "An integrated simulation with design on experiment approach for shop floor improvement solution selections," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 479-498.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:479-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=78143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:eujine:v:10:y:2016:i:4:p:479-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=210 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.