IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/amerfa/v7y2023i2p125-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual structure, themes and disciplines of credit rating determination by rating agencies - a bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jaspreet Kaur
  • Madhu Vij
  • Ajay Kumar Chauhan

Abstract

Credit ratings, given by credit rating agencies, are the opinion about the creditworthiness and the likelihood of timely payment by the issuer. Various factors are analysed by rating agencies to assess the financial soundness of the debt issuer and arrive at ratings. This study presents a bibliometric review of the literature on determinants of corporate credit rating on a sample of 135 articles from January 2001 to June 2021. The articles are analysed to delineate influential aspects, themes, and conceptual, intellectual, and social structure of the knowledge base using different bibliometric techniques. The findings highlight the multi-disciplinary nature of the literature and theoretical foundation based on bankruptcy studies. Further, the keyword co-occurrence analysis suggests corporate social responsibility (CSR), environmental, social and governance (ESG), machine learning, managerial ability, and sustainability as emerging research topics in this field. The study explains the direction and future research scope that will be helpful for academicians, investors, regulators and policy formulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Intellectual structure, themes and disciplines of credit rating determination by rating agencies - a bibliometric analysis," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 125-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:125-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134711
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:125-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=229 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.