IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/amerfa/v5y2017i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinates of Islamic banking profitability: an evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) (2011-2014)

Author

Listed:
  • Qasim Mousa Abu Eid
  • Hussein Mohammad Salameh

Abstract

Islamic banking is attracting the attention of the economic and finance people alike. This paper analyses micro models, micro and macro models of Islamic banking profitability in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) during 2011-2014. The results show that overheads divided by total assets (OVRHD) negatively affect profitability whether at micro level model or micro and macro level model. In addition, annual growth rate of real gross domestic product per capita (GDPPC) positively affect profitability represented by ROA at the micro and macro model. While the ratio of non-interest earning assets divided by total asset (NIEATA) negatively affect profitability represented by ROE at the micro and macro model. Finally, there is no effect of the other variables on the profitability in the four models. As a continuation of this study, further research should be carried out using other Islamic demographic determinants as the adjusted R-square in our model is low.

Suggested Citation

  • Qasim Mousa Abu Eid & Hussein Mohammad Salameh, 2017. "Determinates of Islamic banking profitability: an evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) (2011-2014)," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=229 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.