IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ajesde/v7y2020i3p236-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Savings preference of rural households: empirical evidence from tomato farmers in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Aidoo-Mensah

Abstract

The study examined the choice of mode of savings between formal and informal financial arrangements among tomato farmers. A total of 562 farmers were randomly selected from six districts in three regions: Ashanti, Brong Ahafo and Upper East of Ghana. Descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percentages were computed for the preferred mode of savings. Binary logistic regression and Kendall coefficient of concordance were employed to identify factors underlying the choice of mode of saving and reasons for the preferred mode of savings respectively. The results showed that years of education, respondents' total income, gender and amount saved per period significantly influenced farmers' choice of mode of saving. The study established the fact that gender roles and norms play a significant role in the choice of mode of savings. The results of the study revealed that women are more likely to adopt precautionary savings behaviour, hence, their financial surpluses are kept in more illiquid forms of savings in the informal savings mode. The study also revealed that there is direct movement of 'consumers' of financial services across the various sectors, hence, indifference to the use of formal or informal means to save.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Aidoo-Mensah, 2020. "Savings preference of rural households: empirical evidence from tomato farmers in Ghana," African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 236-255.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ajesde:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:236-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=105687
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ajesde:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:236-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=382 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.