IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ajaafi/v6y2018i2p130-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using multiple approaches in the financial distress evaluation of companies listed in the manufacturing segment of the Nairobi Securities Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • James Arasa Agwata

Abstract

Studies employing various models in the measurement of financial distress in different markets have gained prominence in the last few decades. This study assesses the effectiveness and the generalisability of three bankruptcy prediction models, i.e., the original Altman Z-score model, Ohlson O-score model and the Zmijewski's model by using industry data from the manufacturing segment of the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). The study has three objectives, i.e., to identify the financially distressed firms in the manufacturing segment, to assess whether a significant difference in bankruptcy prediction methods results existed, and to determine which of the three methods highlighted above is the most conservative in its predictions at the NSE. The study concluded by identifying a number of financially distressed and safe firms as per the method results. It was also noted that a significant difference existed in the prediction results of the three methods highlighted above with the Ohlson O-score method coming out as the most conservative in its outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • James Arasa Agwata, 2018. "Using multiple approaches in the financial distress evaluation of companies listed in the manufacturing segment of the Nairobi Securities Exchange," African Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 130-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ajaafi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:130-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92377
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ajaafi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:130-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=383 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.