IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v8y2018i4p413-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do audit quality, political connection, and institutional ownership increase real earnings management? Evidence from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti
  • Andriana Puspitasari

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the influence of audit quality (auditor size and auditor tenure), political connections, and institutional ownership toward real earnings management. In this research, real earnings management was determined by abnormal cash flow from operations. Purposive sampling was conducted and 83 manufacturing companies registered in Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2010-2014 (415 firm-years) were acquired as the samples. For testing the hypotheses, panel data regression with random effect model was used. The findings showed that auditor size and institutional ownership had a positive influence toward real earnings management, while auditor tenure and political connections did not influence real earnings management. The control variables testing showed that firms' leverage and firms' loss had negative influence toward real earnings management. On the other hand, cash ratio had a positive effect toward real earnings management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti & Andriana Puspitasari, 2018. "Do audit quality, political connection, and institutional ownership increase real earnings management? Evidence from Indonesia," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 413-430.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:413-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95245
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:413-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.