IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v6y2016i2p183-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the risk-return tradeoff in the emerging market of Jordan: what role for financial crises?

Author

Listed:
  • Hisham Al Refai
  • Mohamed Abdelaziz Eissa

Abstract

This study investigates the risk-return relationship at sector level in the emerging market of Jordan (ASE) over the period 1999-2014. The results of an unconditional test with a structural breakpoint show that the relationship is not stable, owing to the effect of the recent global financial crisis (GFC). The conditional test proposed by Pettengill et al. (1995) shows that after the GFC, lower risk is compensated for by a lower return. This indicates that there are more risk-averse investors than risk-takers, which does not help to boost the overall market performance. The implications for diversification strategies suggest that, unless higher risk is rewarded by higher return, regional and international investors will not be encouraged to divert their channels of capital to the ASE. The results also carry signs warning policymakers after the recent market improvements, which were intended to attracting FDI inflows. More incentives are required to encourage risk-takers to incline their capital to flow toward the ASE market.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisham Al Refai & Mohamed Abdelaziz Eissa, 2016. "Testing the risk-return tradeoff in the emerging market of Jordan: what role for financial crises?," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 183-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:183-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:183-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.