IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v3y2012i2p136-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Momentum strategies, information diffusion, and investor conservatism in Asian-Pacific region

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Chieh-Tse Hou
  • Phillip J. McKnight
  • Torng-Her Lee

Abstract

This study performs an out-of-sample test on momentum effects in nine Asian-Pacific stock markets from 1990 to 2002. We find little evidence on the existence of intermediate stocks return momentum. Specifically, the unrestricted momentum trading strategies appear profitable only in major developed countries but not in the emerging countries in our samples. We further investigate momentum effects through two behavioural theories: Hong and Stein's (1999) gradual-information-diffusion model and Barberis et al.'s (1998) investor conservatism bias model. Our results support Barberis et al. (1998) model but reject the Hong and Stein's information diffusion hypothesis. It shows the profitability of momentum strategies is positively related to analyst coverage but negatively related to analysts' forecast dispersion. We argue that investors' psychological conservatism biases reflect slow updating of their beliefs and underrate the importance of new information. Interestingly, we also find that book-to-market is more important than dispersion and dispersion is more important than size in explaining momentum returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Chieh-Tse Hou & Phillip J. McKnight & Torng-Her Lee, 2012. "Momentum strategies, information diffusion, and investor conservatism in Asian-Pacific region," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 136-160.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:136-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=48246
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:136-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.