IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A critical analysis of auditors' perception of the impact of Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act on audit quality: an Egyptian perspective

Listed author(s):
  • Mohamed Hegazy
  • Noha Abou Kamer
Registered author(s):

    The recent accounting scandals that have occurred in the USA have resulted in the issuance of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX), with emphasis on Section 404 related to enhancing the companies' internal controls. This research study critically examines Section 404 requirements, surveying a sample of Egyptian auditors in a number of audit firms with international affiliations about their perception of the expected costs and benefits that could result from applying Section 404, and whether such requirements could have a positive impact on the quality of audit. The results provide evidence based on auditors' opinions that the benefits associated with Section 404 applications are expected to outweigh its costs, with possible reduction of Section 404 costs in the future period. Moreover, the results indicate that both the additional audit procedures required in the audit of internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) and the increased legal liability that will be imposed on auditors through compliance with Section 404 requirements are expected to improve the quality of the audit process. The results of the study call for the application of similar requirements of Section 404 taking into consideration the characteristics and other elements affecting the Egyptian businesses, accounting and auditing profession.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 154-182

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:154-182
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:154-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.