IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/afasfa/v12y2022i1p1-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the recovery of Indian banks under prompt corrective action framework: TOPSIS methodology

Author

Listed:
  • K.C. Arora
  • L. Ramani

Abstract

The current study empirically investigates the comparative financial health of each of the 12 Indian banks under prompt corrective action (PCA) framework considering multiple triggers of PCA framework collectively. A model for predicting the recovery of these banks from PCA has been proposed based on three different multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM), one being the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) proposed by Hwang and Yoon (1981) to rank the set of alternatives. It has been hypothesised that higher the rank, faster could be the recovery of a bank based on multiple trigger values of these banks for three to four years from the date of revised PCA framework. The results have been amply validated with the action of the Indian banking regulator, the Reserve Bank of India, to declare some of the banks out of PCA framework in January and February 2019.

Suggested Citation

  • K.C. Arora & L. Ramani, 2022. "Modelling the recovery of Indian banks under prompt corrective action framework: TOPSIS methodology," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121762
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:afasfa:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=214 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.