IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Cooperación Y Competencia Como Antecedentes De La Innovación De Producto. ¿Aplican Las Empresas Nuevas Y Establecidas Una Lógica Diferenciada? / Cooperation And Competition As Antecedents Of Product Innovation. Is There A Different Logic For New Ventures And Incumbents?

Listed author(s):
  • Antolín-López, Raquel


    (Universidad de Almería (España))

  • Martínez-del-Río, Javier


    (Universidad de Almería (España))

  • Céspedes-Lorente, José


    (Universidad de Almería (España))

Registered author(s):

    En este trabajo se examina la relación entre distintos tipos de colaboración y competencia con la innovación de producto, diferenciando entre empresas nuevas y establecidas. Las hipótesis propuestas sugieren un patrón de «co-operación» diferenciado. Específicamente, para las empresas nuevas, las colaboraciones más efectivas son las que les permiten abaratar costes y reducir riesgos (pymes, otras empresas nuevas, entidades financieras y centros de conocimiento). En cambio, las empresas establecidas se benefician más de la colaboración con otras empresas establecidas. Adicionalmente, la relación entre una competencia intensa y la innovación de producto es más fuerte para las empresas establecidas que para las nuevas. Los resultados obtenidos, empleando una muestra de 3.528 empresas en clústeres geográficos de 32 países europeos, confirman en términos generales las hipótesis establecidas. Estos resultados presentan interesantes implicaciones para la investigación en entrepreneurship, cooperación y dinámicas competitivas. / The relationships between different types of cooperation and rivalry and product innovation are examined in this article, differentiating between new and established companies. The hypotheses proposed suggest different patterns of cooperation. For new companies, the most effective types of cooperation are those which can lower costs and reduce risks (small and medium size companies, other new companies, financial bodies and knowledge centres). On the other hand, established companies may benefit more by cooperating with other established companies. Furthermore, the relationship between intense rivalry and product innovation is stronger for established companies than for new ones. The results obtained, using a sample of 3,528 companies in geographical clusters of 32 European countries, confirm the established hypotheses in general terms. These results have interesting implications for research into entrepreneurship, cooperation and competitive dynamics.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM) in its journal Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa.

    Volume (Year): 19 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 53-62

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:19:y:2013:i:1:p:53-62
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Vigo, Lagoas - Marcosende s/n, E-36310, Vigo, Pontevedra, España

    Phone: (+34) 986812473
    Fax: (+34) 986812401
    Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:19:y:2013:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tony Crespo Franco)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.