IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/idi/jiedee/v14y2008i3p15-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Razones Para Crecer En La Empresa Familiar: Un Análisis Comparativo / Reasons To Grow In The Family Firm: A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fuentes Lombardo, G.

    () (Universidad de Jaén (España))

  • Hernández Ortiz, M.J.

    () (Universidad de Jaén (España))

  • Vallejo Martos, M.C.

    () (Universidad de Jaén (España))

Abstract

El crecimiento de la empresa puede considerarse un objetivo estratégico muy interesante independientemente de que el negocio sea familiar o no. Si bien, las peculiaridades que caracterizan a las empresas familiares, consecuencia del solapamiento que se produce entre tres sistemas distintos (familia, empresa y propiedad), pueden ser el motivo de que la empresa se plantee alcanzar este objetivo por razones distintas a otras empresas que no revistan este carácter familiar. Los resultados obtenidos en un estudio empírico realizado en el sector vitivinícola con denominación de origen en España muestran que a medida que la empresa tiene un mayor grado de familiaridad, el crecimiento se persigue más por motivos familiares que por motivos empresariales. De otro lado, cuando la empresa presenta un menor grado de familiaridad las razones empresariales para fijar como objetivo estratégico el crecimiento están más presentes. Al mismo tiempo los propósitos que llevan a las empresas a fijar este objetivo difieren en función de si los directivos de la compañía pertenecen o no a la familia propietaria. / Growth is considered a very important strategic goal for family and non family firms. However, due to the singularities of family firms and the overlap of their three different systems (family, management and ownership), their reasons to grow can be different from non family firms. The results of this empirical research in the Spanish wine Industry show that when familiness is higher, the growth is motivated more for family than for business reasons. On the other hand, when the firms show a less familiness, growth as a strategic goal is more motivated for business reasons. At the same time, reasons to justify growth are different if the managers of the company are or not members of the owned family.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuentes Lombardo, G. & Hernández Ortiz, M.J. & Vallejo Martos, M.C., 2008. "Razones Para Crecer En La Empresa Familiar: Un Análisis Comparativo / Reasons To Grow In The Family Firm: A Comparative Analysis," Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 14(3), pages 15-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:14:y:2008:i:3:p:15-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aedem-virtual.com/articulos/iedee/v14/143015.pdf
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol J. Simon & Mary W. Sullivan, 1993. "The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 28-52.
    2. Bronwyn H. Hall., 1993. "The Value of Intangible Corporate Assets: An Empirical Study of the Components of Tobin's Q," Economics Working Papers 93-207, University of California at Berkeley.
    3. Klein, Benjamin & Leffler, Keith B, 1981. "The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(4), pages 615-641, August.
    4. Prasad A. Naik & Kalyan Raman & Russell S. Winer, 2005. "Planning Marketing-Mix Strategies in the Presence of Interaction Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 25-34, June.
    5. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, pages 1504-1511.
    6. Jan W. Rivkin, 2000. "Imitation of Complex Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, pages 824-844.
    7. S.A. Lippman & R.P. Rumelt, 1982. "Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 418-438, Autumn.
    8. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, pages 1514-1514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:14:y:2008:i:3:p:15-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tony Crespo Franco). General contact details of provider: http://www.aedem-virtual.com/es/journal/iedee .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.