IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

La Problemática En La Medición Del Aprendizaje Organizativo: Una Revisión /

  • Real Fernández, J. C.

    ()

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide (España))

  • Leal Millán, A.

    ()

    (Universidad de Sevilla (España))

  • Roldán Salgueiro, J. L.

    ()

    (Universidad de Sevilla (España))

El escaso consenso que se ha producido en torno al significado del aprendizaje organizativo (AO) ha provocado un insuficiente debate sobre su medición (Easterby-Smith, Crossan y Nicolini, 2000). A pesar de la extensa literatura existente sobre este tópico, se han producido muy pocos intentos de operativizar el constructo a través de técnicas cuantitativas (Chaston, Badger y Sadler-Smith, 1999). El AO, considerado como un resultado, ha sido tratado como un instrumento unidimensional (Levitt y March, 1988). Sin embargo, su análisis como un proceso duradero vinculado a la adquisición de conocimiento y a la mejora de rendimiento, ha hecho posible estudiar su carácter complejo y multidimensional. En la última década se ha experimentado en el ámbito académico un creciente interés por el desarrollo de una escala de medida que permita valorar el AO como constructo latente multidimensional. En este sentido, este trabajo pretende mostrar una revisión de las escalas que se han empleado en la literatura para medir los diferentes significados con los que se ha hecho referencia al concepto de AO. / The lack of consensus surrounding organizational learning (OL) meaning has given rise to an insufficient debate about its measurement (Easterby-Smith, Crossan and Nicolini, 2000). In spite of the extensive literature about OL, it has been given insufficient opportunity to operate using quantitative techniques (Chaston, Badger and Sadler-Smith, 1999). As a result, the OL is considered to be an unidimensional construct (Levitt and March, 1988). However, when it is analyzed as a process linked to knowledge acquisition and improvement of performance, it is possible to study in depth its complex and multidimensional character. In the last decade, the academic field has showed an increasing interest in OL through the development of a measurement scale that allows to consider the OL as a latent multidimensional construct. Due to circumstances, this work tries to present a revision of the scales used in the literature for measuring the OL concept.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.aedem-virtual.com/articulos/iedee/v12/121153.pdf
File Function: complete text
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM) in its journal Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa.

Volume (Year): 12 (2006)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 153-166

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:12:y:2006:i:1:p:153-166
Contact details of provider: Postal: Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Vigo, Lagoas - Marcosende s/n, E-36310, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
Phone: (+34) 986812473
Fax: (+34) 986812401
Web page: http://www.aedem-virtual.com/es/journal/iedee

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idi:jiedee:v:12:y:2006:i:1:p:153-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tony Crespo Franco)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.