IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjpf/v06y2008i1p52-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from Sarawak Municipals, 1975-2003

Author

Listed:
  • Muzafar Shah Habibullah
  • A M Dayang-Affizzah

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the issue of the intertemporal relationship between revenues and expenditures and the way in which a State Government manages public deficits. In this study, different hypotheses are considered to examine such a problem. The so-called tax-spend hypothesis postulates that government raises tax revenues ahead of engaging in new expenditures (Buchanan and Wagner, 1978; and Friedman,1978). The spend-tax hypothesis, on the other hand, predicts that government first spends and then increases tax revenues to finance their expenditures (Barro, 1974; and Peacock and Wiseman, 1979). There is also the fiscal synchronization hypothesis which suggests that government takes simultaneous decisions about revenues and expenditures (Musgrave, 1966; and Meltzer and Richard, 1981). Lastly, there is independence regarding the decisions to spend and raise revenues (Baghestani and McNown, 1994). Using the annual data on revenues and expenditures for the 22 municipals in Sarawak for the period 1975-2003, the cointegration and vector error correction model analyses suggest that the results are at best mixed.

Suggested Citation

  • Muzafar Shah Habibullah & A M Dayang-Affizzah, 2008. "The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from Sarawak Municipals, 1975-2003," The IUP Journal of Public Finance, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 52-65, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:06:y:2008:i:1:p:52-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjpf:v:06:y:2008:i:1:p:52-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.