IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjmo/v04y2006i1p6-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Structure for Monetary Policy: A Comparative Assessment of Ten Central Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Jiji T Mathew

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to evaluate the institutional quality of ten central banks. The countries included for this study are New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Germany, Chile, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Hong Kong and India. The central banks of these countries exhibit many disparities and similarities in their monetary regimes which provide ample scope for their analysis and evaluation. The analysis of the institutional experiences of other central banks offers rich lessons to India in pursuing its central bank reforms. This study reveals that almost all the central banks, with the exception of Indonesia and India, exhibit high standards of institutional quality in terms of balancing independence, transparency and accountability. The Central Bank (CB) models of the United Kingdom and New Zealand stand first in the world in this regard, closely followed by the United States and Chile.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiji T Mathew, 2006. "Institutional Structure for Monetary Policy: A Comparative Assessment of Ten Central Banks," The IUP Journal of Monetary Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(1), pages 6-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjmo:v:04:y:2006:i:1:p:6-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjmo:v:04:y:2006:i:1:p:6-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.