An I(d) Statistical Model for the Canadian Real Output
Annual data of the Canadian real GDP (1871-1998) are examined in this article by means of statistical skills developed for testing I(d) statistical processes. The results show that when looking at the whole range of data, the unit root hypothesis is rejected in favor of more nonstationary alternatives. However, splitting the data during the Great Crash in 1929, the I(1) hypothesis cannot be rejected for the first subsample, being strongly rejected in favor of higher orders of integration for the period after 1929. Thus, the degree of dependence between the observations has substantially increased across the sample, implying the need of strong policy actions to bring GDP back to its original level.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): III (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjmo:v:03:y:2005:i:1:p:79-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.