IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Privatization: Do We Need to Change the Strategy?

Listed author(s):
  • Jayashree Dubey
  • Dharmesh Shah
Registered author(s):

    Privatization, the buzzword under the NDA government, has been largely appreciated by the intelligentsia. At the same time, there was criticism too, especially at the resale of Hotel Centaur Mumbai to Sahara India Group at Rs. 115 cr, just after six months of disinvestment and sale to Batra Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., at Rs. 83 cr. Similarly, Tatas’ attempt to divert Rs. 1200 plus cr from the corpus of VSNL to Tata Teleservices Ltd., has put a big question mark on the rationality of the decision. The disinvestment process was adopted by the Government of India in the year 1991 mainly to fill the lacuna in the ability of the government to run the Public Sector units profitably, which in turn added to the burden of the exchequer. In the process, the profit-making companies were also put on the block. There is a need to properly analyze the profit history of a PSU compared to that of the private companies in the same industry and to see how best the problem of loss or decrease in profit of PSU’s over the years can be combated before rushing into disinvestment. The policy also needs revision on the basis of lessons learnt from previous experiences of disinvestment.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by IUP Publications in its journal The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics.

    Volume (Year): III (2005)
    Issue (Month): 4 (November)
    Pages: 28-38

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjme:v:03:y:2005:i:4:p:28-38
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjme:v:03:y:2005:i:4:p:28-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.