IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjfe/v04y2006i4p75-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can There Be A Proper Calculation Procedure Of The Poverty Line?

Author

Listed:
  • Aurobindo Ghosh

Abstract

Poverty has become a prominent topic for social policy discussions in India. Different countries have their own methodologies to calculate the poverty line. This is the reason why they are country-wise unique. In India, it is generally calculated through calorie intake measure. As the measurement criterion is not very sound because of the limited access to the technology of food calorie measurement, the calculation of poverty line in India is invariably with less or no proper validation. This paper tries to minimize the subjectivity, and aims to convert the poverty line concept into a realistic line concept by using the 3s-limit of normal distribution model. The author validates the usual calorie-based measurement by the new 3s-limit concept. It is shown that within a particular population with varied income groups, the actual poverty line can be drawn. This line shows that the rich people’s data is not only redundant but should also be eliminated from the actual calculations, as this will only inflate the data under consideration, resulting in wrong value of calculated poverty line. The 3s-limit calculation is shown step by step with examples through which the segments of the population falling under different categories, like super-rich, rich, average, poor, and very poor, can easily be located. People falling under very poor category are the people under poverty line.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurobindo Ghosh, 2006. "Can There Be A Proper Calculation Procedure Of The Poverty Line?," The IUP Journal of Financial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(4), pages 75-89, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjfe:v:04:y:2006:i:4:p:75-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjfe:v:04:y:2006:i:4:p:75-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.