IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjcs/v6y2012i2p20-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy-Based Approach Using Enhanced Function Point to Evaluate the Performance of Software Project

Author

Listed:
  • M Pauline
  • P Aruna
  • B Shadaksharappa

Abstract

Performance measurement is a fundamental building block of total quality management and a total quality organization. It is a measurement indicator for software development projects to define, understand, collect and analyze data, and prioritize through valid comparisons and make appropriate improvements. One of the indicators is Effort Estimation which helps in managing overall budgeting and planning. Size and complexity of the software can be derived from function point analysis method. This paper discusses a model for effort estimation, which focuses on minimizing the effort by enhancing the adjustments made to the functional sizing techniques. The idea of grouping the adjustment factors is introduced to simplify the process of adjustment and to ensure more consistency in the adjustments. The proposed method uses fuzzy logic for quantifying the quality of requirements and this quality factor is added as one of the adjustment factors. Effort estimation is calculated using the proposed model taking hospital desktop application and HR application as case studies. A comparative study of effort estimation between function point sizing (using FP and productivity) and the proposed model is analyzed. The other measurement indicators are project duration, schedule predictability, requirements completion ratio and post-release defect density which are also calculated for the above case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • M Pauline & P Aruna & B Shadaksharappa, 2012. "Fuzzy-Based Approach Using Enhanced Function Point to Evaluate the Performance of Software Project," The IUP Journal of Computer Sciences, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 20-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjcs:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:20-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjcs:v:6:y:2012:i:2:p:20-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.