IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Performance Of Banks Through Camel Model: A Case Study Of Sbi And Icici


  • B S Bodla
  • Richa Verma


The present supervisory system in banking sector is a substantial improvement over the earlier system in terms of frequency, coverage and focus as also the tools employed. Nearly one-half of the Basle Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision has already been adhered to and the remaining is at a stage of implementation. Two Supervisory Rating Models, based on CAMELS and CACS factors for rating of the Indian Commercial Banks and Foreign Banks operating in India respectively, have been worked out on the lines recommended by the Padmanabhan Working Group (1995). These ratings would enable the Reserve Bank to identify the banks whose condition warrants special supervisory attention. This paper studies the performance of SBI and ICICI through CAMEL Model for the period 2000-01 to 2004-05. It is found that SBI has an edge over its counterpart ICICI in terms of Capital Adequacy. However, the vice versa is true regarding assets quality, earning quality and management quality. The liquidity position of both the banks is sound and does not differ significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • B S Bodla & Richa Verma, 2006. "Evaluating Performance Of Banks Through Camel Model: A Case Study Of Sbi And Icici," The IUP Journal of Bank Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 49-63, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:5:y:2006:i:3:p:49-63

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:wsi:ijfexx:v:04:y:2017:i:02n03:n:s2424786317500062 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:5:y:2006:i:3:p:49-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.