IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Evaluating Performance Of Banks Through Camel Model: A Case Study Of Sbi And Icici

  • B S Bodla
  • Richa Verma
Registered author(s):

    The present supervisory system in banking sector is a substantial improvement over the earlier system in terms of frequency, coverage and focus as also the tools employed. Nearly one-half of the Basle Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision has already been adhered to and the remaining is at a stage of implementation. Two Supervisory Rating Models, based on CAMELS and CACS factors for rating of the Indian Commercial Banks and Foreign Banks operating in India respectively, have been worked out on the lines recommended by the Padmanabhan Working Group (1995). These ratings would enable the Reserve Bank to identify the banks whose condition warrants special supervisory attention. This paper studies the performance of SBI and ICICI through CAMEL Model for the period 2000-01 to 2004-05. It is found that SBI has an edge over its counterpart ICICI in terms of Capital Adequacy. However, the vice versa is true regarding assets quality, earning quality and management quality. The liquidity position of both the banks is sound and does not differ significantly.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by IUP Publications in its journal The IUP Journal of Bank Management.

    Volume (Year): V (2006)
    Issue (Month): 3 (August)
    Pages: 49-63

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:5:y:2006:i:3:p:49-63
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:5:y:2006:i:3:p:49-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.