IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjbm/v13y2014i3p57-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Credit Risk Management Framework of Public and Private Sector Banks in India: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anju Arora
  • Muneesh Kumar

Abstract

Professional management and sincere efforts towards upgrading Credit Risk Management (CRM) framework have gained reasonable pace in both the public and private sector banks alike. The present study, first of its kind, attempts to find the difference in the strength of overall CRM framework of private and public sector banks in India in quantitative terms and also identifies the specific CRM elements leading to such differences in their respective frameworks, if any. A mathematical evaluation tool, namely, CRM Index Score, comprising quantitative assessment of the current set of CRM practices relating to organization, policy and strategy, operations and systems at transaction level and operations and systems at portfolio level, the four basic elements of CRM framework, were deployed for making a comparative evaluation. The findings revealed that the strength of the overall CRM framework did not vary significantly between public and private sector banks as on the whole there existed very little difference in the scores of the public and private sector banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Anju Arora & Muneesh Kumar, 2014. "Evaluating the Credit Risk Management Framework of Public and Private Sector Banks in India: A Comparative Study," The IUP Journal of Bank Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(3), pages 57-66, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:57-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:57-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.