IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjbm/v10y2011i2p43-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Importance of Profitability Drivers of Indian Banks: A Preference Decomposition Approach

Author

Listed:
  • P K Viswanathan
  • M Ranganatham
  • G Balasubramanian

Abstract

The Asset Liability Management (ALM) process in a bank is multidimensional in nature. The best possible trade off solution for profitability will have to strike an appropriate balance among the key drivers viz., advances, investments, deposits and other income (non-interest income), while simultaneously taking care of the regulatory and other constraints. The objective of this paper is to estimate, in a robust manner, the relative importance of advances, investments, deposits and other income in predicting profits. A comparative assessment is made of the two methods: Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and Robust Regression based on Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) in order to select the one that is appropriate in this situation. The results show that the robust regression outperforms OLS in terms of predictive accuracy, particularly in the context characterized by outliers and non-normal distribution with longer tails. Elasticity coefficients have been computed using the estimated slopes of the robust regression as inputs for arriving at the percentage relative importance of each driver of profitability. For this study, data filtering for inconsistencies warranted exclusion of some banks. Secondly, the focus is mainly on predictive accuracy and not hypothesis testing where OLS may still prove to be more useful. These are the two limitations of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • P K Viswanathan & M Ranganatham & G Balasubramanian, 2011. "Relative Importance of Profitability Drivers of Indian Banks: A Preference Decomposition Approach," The IUP Journal of Bank Management, IUP Publications, vol. 0(2), pages 43-56, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:10:y:2011:i:2:p:43-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjbm:v:10:y:2011:i:2:p:43-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.