IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjar/v07y2008i4p28-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Timeliness of Corporate Disclosure of Selected Companies in India

Author

Listed:
  • Poonam Mahajan
  • Subhash Chander

Abstract

This study empirically examines the quality of corporate disclosure with special reference to its qualitative attribute of ‘Timeliness’. It is based on a sample of 288 and 292 companies drawn from BT-500 companies (November, 2004 issue) for the financial years 2004-05 and 2005-06. Auditor’s report has been used as a surrogate for timeliness. PROWESS, the database of Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) has been used as a major source of data collection. SPSS 10.05 has been used as a statistical tool to arrive at results. Descriptive statistics indicate that almost all the companies in the sample report within 180 days (as set by regulatory authorities in India) during both the years of the study. Non-parametric test namely Spearman’s rank correlation has been used to check the association of the independent variables with reporting lag. Backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that the corporate attributes namely, size of a firm, nature of industry and audit specific attributes namely, audit firm size and audit complexity significantly influence the reporting lag of selected companies in India during both the years of study. Rest of the variables namely, profitability of a firm, listing category, residential status, age, leverage and audit fee could not significantly influence the reporting lag during both the years of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Poonam Mahajan & Subhash Chander, 2008. "Determinants of Timeliness of Corporate Disclosure of Selected Companies in India," The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, IUP Publications, vol. 0(4), pages 28-63, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:4:p:28-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:4:p:28-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.