IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/icf/icfjaf/v18y2012i3p31-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio Selection Revisited: Evidence from the Indian Stock Market

Author

Listed:
  • Kushankur Dey
  • Debasish Maitra

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to examine the reliability and usefulness of ex ante measures of portfolio formulation by selecting securities from a well-defined sampling frame. Four indices are employed to achieve the objectives of the study, namely, Sharpe index, Treynor index, Jensen index and Sortino index. Incorporation of the four indices helps in understanding theoretical underpinnings of both modern and post-modern portfolio theories. The study is conducted in the Indian context with special reference to S&P500 CNX NIFTY index, wherein the selection of the security for constructing the index is subject to three criteria: liquidity, market capitalization, and floating stocks. Using the Sharpe’s algorithm, cut-off is calculated to formulate the portfolio of 26 stocks out of 50 stocks. A comprehensive analysis of each individual stock, portfolio, and index is presented with respect to their annualized returns, annualized standard deviations, betas, residual variances or deviations. This study provides a basis for a large section of investors, especially retail investors, for analyzing, selecting, and evaluating their portfolios as an index tracker onto some specific reference point.

Suggested Citation

  • Kushankur Dey & Debasish Maitra, 2012. "Portfolio Selection Revisited: Evidence from the Indian Stock Market," The IUP Journal of Applied Finance, IUP Publications, vol. 18(3), pages 31-47, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjaf:v:18:y:2012:i:3:p:31-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjaf:v:18:y:2012:i:3:p:31-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G R K Murty (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.