IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Purchasing Power Parity of Papua New Guinea: A Cointegration Analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Guneratne B Wickremasinghe

The paper attempts to examine the validity of the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis for Papua New Guinea (PNG) during the floating exchange rate regime. Exchange rates for the Australian dollar, Japanese yen, the UK pound and the US dollar in terms of kina are used in the empirical analysis. Two models restricted and unrestricted are used to investigate the validity of the PPP hypothesis. For the restricted model, Johansen cointegration test finds that there are long run relationships between the kina exchange rates for the Australian dollar, Japanese yen and the US dollar and the ratio of PNG price level to price levels of Australia, Japan and the US. The results for the unrestricted model indicate long run relationships between the kina exchange rates for all the four currencies and price level of PNG and those of the four countries. These results are consistent with the PPP hypothesis. However, results for any of the currencies do not support the symmetry and proportionality conditions implied by the PPP hypothesis.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by IUP Publications in its journal The IUP Journal of Applied Economics.

Volume (Year): VI (2007)
Issue (Month): 4 (July)
Pages: 7-21

in new window

Handle: RePEc:icf:icfjae:v:06:y:2007:i:3:p:7-21
Contact details of provider:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:icf:icfjae:v:06:y:2007:i:3:p:7-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (G R K Murty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.