IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibg/eajour/v40y2007i3-4p38-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreign Direct Investment and National Competitiveness – Financial Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Rovcanin

    (University of Sarajevo)

Abstract

Renewed confidence in the positive benefits of FDI to the economic development of the host country has led many countries to be more open towards FDI since the beginning of 1990s.1 As a result of increased liberalisation and technological advances, FDI flows rapidly increased during last few decades. FDI increased as a ration of domestic investment and GDP in many countries (UNCTAD, 2005). However, while some countries attracted large FDI flows, others were less successful, even though they had liberalised FDI regimes. A huge number of different studies on the impact of FDI on economic growth and productivity of domestic economy have been published.2 A general conclusion of these studies is that the benefits of the foreign companies in terms of economic development, even though they possesses a bundle of desirable assets (including a long-term external financing, new technology, skills, management practice and market access), and in general they are more productive, pay higher wages and are more export intensive than local firms, are by no means automatic. In addition, researches showed that FDI can also lead to some less desirable or undesirable outcomes such as rising inequality between individuals or groups of individuals in the society and between the regions, direct or indirect crowding-out of local capabilities or an erosion of the tax base or labour and environmental standards. Development of the local absorptive capacity (skills, R&D, infrastructure and etc.), is of the key importance in shaping the ultimate effect of FDI, suggesting an important role of complementary policy. Different programmes of encouraging linkages between TNCs and local firms, programmes supporting clusterisation and upgrading FDI are also approved as important. In this paper we analyze appropriate role of FDI policy in raising national competitiveness. The first section discusses the role of FDI in technology transfer, learning and competitiveness. Here we analyze benefits and costs of internalized technology transfer through FDI flows and in general, this type of technology transfer is very efficient mean of transferring a package of capital, skills, information, networks, and brand names to developing countries. For many technologies, internalised transfers are the only possible mode of transfer. Also, internalization may be the most efficient way of transferring the tacit knowledge involved and in the case of rapid technology changes. However, internalized technology transfer may also have some expenses. In general, the more standardized and diffused the technology and the more capable the buyer, the more economical will externalized modes be. A more subtle reason in favour of externalization concerns the existence of learning benefits, deepening and externalities. Costs of internalized technology transfer are especially expressed on the top level of technological capabilities where local innovative efforts become viable. At this stage, there is a case for restricting reliance of internalized forms to promote local R&D capabilities based on externalized forms, or for intervening in the FDI process to induce MNCs to transfer more advanced technological functions. We discuss the rationale for FDI policy and preset the experience of Ireland and Singapore since these two countries have been highlighted for using the best-practice policies toward attracting FDI. Using benchmarking method we analyze FDI policy in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Rovcanin, 2007. "Foreign Direct Investment and National Competitiveness – Financial Aspects," Economic Analysis, Institute of Economic Sciences, vol. 40(3-4), pages 38-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibg:eajour:v:40:y:2007:i:3-4:p:38-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ien.bg.ac.rs/index.php/en/2007/2007-34
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven G. Rivkin & Eric A. Hanushek & John F. Kain, 2005. "Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 417-458, March.
    2. Schneider, Andrea, 2010. "Redistributive taxation vs. education subsidies: Fostering equality and social mobility in an intergenerational model," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 597-605, August.
    3. Hoyt, William H. & Lee, Kangoh, 1998. "Educational vouchers, welfare effects, and voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 211-228, June.
    4. McMillan, Robert, 2004. "Competition, incentives, and public school productivity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 1871-1892, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FDI policy; competitiveness; Bosnia and Hertzegovina;

    JEL classification:

    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibg:eajour:v:40:y:2007:i:3-4:p:38-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zorica Bozic). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ienbgyu.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.