IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/gjbres/v17y2023i1p55-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Failure Of The Twentieth Century European Perpetual Peace Project: The Social Construction Of The West Via Opposition To Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Benedict E. DeDominicis

Abstract

This paper critiques the de facto equation of Europeanization with submission to U.S. hegemony. It traces the choices that allowed the EU to be equated as one of side of the same coin with NATO. France’s 2009 rejoining the NATO command structure encouraged this perception. It comports with the claim that US liberal hegemony made the European integration process feasible. It highlights the consequences for conflict resolution of the Europeanization process being equated with attitudinal orientation towards accepting U.S. hegemony. Ukraine is a case study of this process on the level of indirect conflict between Moscow and Washington each seeking to contain each other. European integration’s focus on developing vested economic and bureaucratic interests has tied it to U.S. hegemony. It facilitated the institutionalization of anti-Moscow influence tendencies in European integration. The paper adopts a process tracing methodological approach with a focus on the Cold War and the prevailing views that have emerged around it. The institutionalization of Euro-Atlantic integration includes the internalization of the assumption that the USSR, and later Russia, were imperialist aggressors. The US-led Euro-Atlantic community successfully, and relatively peacefully, contained it. Moscow’s prevailing view does not share this problematic analysis regarding post-1945 Soviet foreign policy motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2023. "The Failure Of The Twentieth Century European Perpetual Peace Project: The Social Construction Of The West Via Opposition To Russia," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 17(1), pages 55-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:55-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v17n1-2023/GJBR-V17N1-2023-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lesia Savchenko & Anatolii Subbot & Yurii Demianchuk, 2018. "Influence Of Corruption On The Economic Development Of Ukraine In Terms Of Reformation: A Retrospective Analysis," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    2. Gëzim Visoka & John Doyle, 2016. "Neo‐Functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 862-877, July.
    3. Maitra, Sumantra, 2021. "NATO Enlargement, Russia, and Balance of Threat," SocArXiv dcjsk, Center for Open Science.
    4. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2022. "Historical Analogies And The Ukraine Crisis: Comparisons And Contrasts Of Interwar German With Post-Cold War Serbian And Russian Irredentism And Western Responses," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 15-46.
    5. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2023. "The Social Identity Dynamics Of The Europeanization Of Bulgaria: Reconstructing Gramscian Hegemony In A Post-Neocolonial Balkan Nation-State," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 16(1), pages 49-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrej Semenov, 2022. "Legal and Political Contradictions in Kosovo: Limits of the Brussels Agreement," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Union; International Political Economy; International Relations; Nationalism; NATO; Russia; US Hegemony; Ukraine;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism
    • F54 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Colonialism; Imperialism; Postcolonialism
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:55-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.