IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2025i4p64-79.html

Rural Banks (BPR/BPRS) in Indonesia: Regulation, Strategy, and the Wet-Market Segment

Author

Listed:
  • Doni Maradona

    (Institute of Technology and Business Ahmad Dahlan, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Rural Banks (BPR/BPRS) play a critical role in expanding financial inclusion and supporting micro, small, and medium enterprises across Indonesia. Despite their strategic importance, the sector faces substantial structural challenges, including tightening regulatory requirements, uneven digital transformation, increasing credit risk, and persistent weaknesses in governance and operational capacity. These conditions necessitate a comprehensive assessment of the institutional dynamics, regulatory landscape, and strategic readiness of BPR/BPRS in navigating the rapidly changing financial ecosystem. This study aims to analyse: (1) the evolution of regulatory and institutional pressures shaping BPR/BPRS operations; (2) the current conditions of governance, digital capabilities, and risk structures; and (3) the strategic transformation required to strengthen institutional resilience and competitiveness. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, utilising documentary analysis of secondary data, including regulatory documents, industry publications, national banking statistics, and international comparative studies. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, institutional analysis, and comparative strategic analysis. The findings reveal that BPR/BPRS are subject to increasing regulatory pressure, particularly related to capital adequacy, risk management, governance, and reporting integrity. Digitalisation is progressing but remains uneven, constrained by human resource limitations, technological readiness, and misalignment between digital initiatives and business strategy. Prudential indicators highlight vulnerabilities in credit risk and operational efficiency, while the wet-market segment offers growth potential that requires disciplined risk control. The study concludes that BPR/BPRS transformation requires: aligning business strategies with regulatory expectations, strengthening governance and human capital, accelerating capability-based digitalisation, and enhancing proactive risk management. Policy recommendations emphasise developing a realistic digital roadmap, promoting institutional consolidation, and reinforcing risk-based supervision to ensure long-term sector sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Doni Maradona, 2025. "Rural Banks (BPR/BPRS) in Indonesia: Regulation, Strategy, and the Wet-Market Segment," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 64-79, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:4:p:64-79
    DOI: 10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-64-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/1193-silski-banki-bpr-bprs-v-indonezii-regulyuvannya-strategiya-ta-segment-mokrogo-rinku.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/1193/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2518-1181-2025-4(110)-64-79?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2025:i:4:p:64-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.