IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2022i4p37-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stress Testing of Banks in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Posadnieva

    (Kherson National Technical University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine)

Abstract

The banking system of any state is a component of its economic system. Therefore the stability of the entire national economy depends on its smooth and effective functioning. Given the globalization of economic relations today, the stability of the banking systems of other countries with open market economies, which have close financial ties, depends on the stability of the US banking sector. The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of stress testing of banks in the USA and to assess the dynamics of the stability of the banking system of this country over the past 20 years. Stress testing of banks in the USA is carried out to identify and measure the banking sector's vulnerability to shock macroeconomic events in the national and global economy. This study is based on the analysis of the dynamics of four indicators: the capital sensitivity coefficient, the sensitivity index to the forced quick sale of assets, the liquidity coefficient for stress scenarios, and the sensitivity index to the loss of liquidity and solvency. It was revealed that the US banking system was most unstable during the 2008-2009 crisis when banks suffered significant losses due to risky credit policies. Post-crisis regulation of capital and liquidity, thanks to the balanced policy of the Federal Reserve System, led to many subsequent years of stability. Banks also had to apply anti-crisis regulatory measures in the "covid" 2020 year, and these measures brought positive results. The shock events did not affect the stability of the US banking system but were reflected in the amount of cash. The loosening of anti-crisis measures in 2021 caused some growth in the indicators calculated during stress testing. However, it did not lead to the destabilization of the banking system.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Posadnieva, 2022. "Stress Testing of Banks in the USA," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 37-42, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2022:i:4:p:37-42
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-37-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/946-zdiysnennya-stres-testuvannya-bankiv-u-ssha.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/946/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2022-4(98)-37-42?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Crosignani & Thomas M. Eisenbach & Fulvia Fringuellotti, 2022. "Banking System Vulnerability: 2022 Update," Liberty Street Economics 20221114, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    2. Dong Beom Choi & Fernando M. Duarte & Thomas M. Eisenbach & James Vickery, 2018. "Ten Years after the Crisis, Is the Banking System Safer?," Liberty Street Economics 20181114, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      banking system; stress testing; capital; liquidity; assets; shock events;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2022:i:4:p:37-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.