IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2021i4p55-61.html

The Effect of Village Funds, Special Allocation Funds, Revenue Sharing Funds on Regional Inequality in the Regencies/Cities of South Sumatra Province

Author

Listed:
  • Fatimah Audia Amelia

    (Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)

  • Azwardi

    (Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)

  • Sukanto

    (Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia)

Abstract

Regions' development is a high priority for Indonesia and is critical for food, equity, and economic growth. To address the problems of economic inequality between regions, the government has created several funds to balance funding for regional development. This study aims to analyze the effect of the Village Funds (DD), Special Allocation Funds (DAK), Revenue Sharing Funds (DBH) on Regional Inequality in the Regencies/Cities of South Sumatra Province during 2015-2019. The research covers 14 regencies and cities of South Sumatra Province. This study uses secondary data, including Village Funds, Special Allocation Funds, Revenue Sharing Funds, and Regional Inequality. Meanwhile, other data is available from the Central Statistics Agency of South Sumatra Province and the Directorate General of Fiscal Balance. The data analysis method used is the Williamson Index and panel data regression analysis that has met the requirements of the classical assumption test and model suitability test. The results of this study are as follows: (1) The Village Funds have a positive and significant effect on Regional Inequality, with the regression coefficient value reaching 0.067. It means that every 1% increase in village funds will increase the value of regional inequality by 0.067. (2) Special Allocation Funds (DAK) and Revenue Sharing Funds (DBH) have a negative and significant effect on Regional Inequality. Each increase in the Special Allocation Fund and Profit Sharing Fund by 1% will cause a decrease in the Regional Inequality Index by 0.022 and 0.050. (3) Regional Inequality in South Sumatra Province is significantly determined by 72% of the variables of the Village Funds, Special Allocation Funds (DAK), and Revenue Sharing Funds (DBH). In comparison, other variables outside the model determine the remaining 28%.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatimah Audia Amelia & Azwardi & Sukanto, 2021. "The Effect of Village Funds, Special Allocation Funds, Revenue Sharing Funds on Regional Inequality in the Regencies/Cities of South Sumatra Province," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 55-61, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:55-61
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2021-4(94)-55-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/868-vpliv-silskih-fondiv-fondiv-cilovogo-finansuvannya-fondiv-rozpodilu-dohodiv-na-regionalnu-nerivnist-u-regentstvah-mistah-provincii-pivdenna-sumatra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/868/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2021-4(94)-55-61?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Boadway & Anwar Shah, 2007. "Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers : Principles and Practice," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7171, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Antonio Slaibe Postali & Fabiana Fontes Rocha, 2011. "Resource windfalls,fiscal effort and public spending: evidence from Brazilianmunicipalities," Anais do XXXVII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 37th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 64, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    2. Amélie BARBIER-GAUCHARD, 2020. "Blueprint for the European Fiscal Union: State of knowledge and Challenges," Working Papers of BETA 2020-39, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Suzuki, Takafumi, 2021. "Capitalization of local government grants on land values: Evidence from Tokyo metropolitan area, Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Julio López-Laborda & Andoni Montes-Nebreda & Jorge Onrubia, 2023. "Going green through local fiscal equalisation," Working Papers 2023-07, FEDEA.
    5. Schakel, Arjan Hille, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government," MPRA Paper 21596, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Juan Luis Gómez Reino & Ana Herrero Alcalde, 2011. "Political Determinants of Regional Financing: The Case of Spain," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 802-820, October.
    7. Genqiang Lei & Xiaohong Huang & Penghui Xi, 2016. "The impact of transfer payments on urban-rural income gap: based on fuzzy RD analysis of China’s midwestern county data," China Finance and Economic Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Yuya Kikuchi & Toshiki Tamai, 2019. "Tax competition, unemployment, and intergovernmental transfers," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(4), pages 899-918, August.
    9. repec:idb:brikps:64058 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Evgeny N. Timushev, 2019. "Federal Intergovernmental Transfers and the Level of Intraregional Fiscal Decentralization in Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 27-42, December.
    11. Alexander N. Deryugin & Kseniya A. Proka, 2017. "Scale Effect Consideration in the Methodologies of Equalization Grants Distribution," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 98-112, August.
    12. Kim, Aehyung, 2008. "Decentralization and the provision of public services : framework and implementation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4503, The World Bank.
    13. World Bank, 2024. "Uganda - Public Expenditure Review 2022-23," World Bank Publications - Reports 41444, The World Bank Group.
    14. Arocena, Pablo & Cabasés, Fermín & Pascual, Pedro, 2022. "A centralized directional distance model for efficient and horizontally equitable grants allocation to local governments," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Otong Suhyanto & Bambang Juanda & Akhmad Fauzi & Ernan Rustiadi, 2021. "The Effect of Transfer Funds on District/Municipality Development Performance in West Java Province Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 22-27.
    16. Debra Hevenstone & Ben Jann, 2016. "Fiscal Federalism and Tax Equalization: The potential for progressive local taxes," University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 19, University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences.
    17. Stotsky, Janet G. & Chakraborty, Lekha & Gandhi, Piyush, 2018. "Impact of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers on Gender Equality in India: An Empirical Analysis," Working Papers 18/240, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    18. Resce, Giuliano, 2022. "The impact of political and non-political officials on the financial management of local governments," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 943-962.
    19. Ehtisham Ahmad & Abdulrazak Al Faris (ed.), 2010. "Fiscal Reforms in the Middle East," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13856.
    20. Wang, Wenming & Kawachi, Keisuke & Ogawa, Hikaru, 2017. "Does equalization transfer enhance partial tax cooperation?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 431-443.
    21. Jeffrey Clemens & Benedic Ippolito, 2018. "Implications of Medicaid Financing Reform for State Government Budgets," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 135-172.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2021:i:4:p:55-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.