Author
Listed:
- Petro Borovyk
(Uman National University of Horticulture, Uman, Ukraine)
- Oleksandr Rolinskyy
(Uman National University of Horticulture, Uman, Ukraine)
- Kateryna Mazur
(Uman National University of Horticulture, Uman, Ukraine)
Abstract
The existing system of budget relations on the level of local budgets in Ukraine has essential drawbacks mainly owing to excessive centralization of budget resources. Purpose of the article is comparative analysis of features of existing budget mechanisms in Ukraine and other countries of the world, and using this as a basis, drawing up of recommendations for introduction of the best elements of foreign budget systems into domestic practice. To solve the majority of local budget problems, the authors bring up the following proposals: 1) to exempt from real estate tax the flats with area up to 120 m2 and dwelling houses with area up to 250 m2; 2) to return to the procedure of distribution of mobilized tax on incomes of physical persons when 75 % of mobilized tax amounts remain in disposal of budgets of villages, cities of district and oblast subordination, as well as districts, 25 % - in oblast budgets and 50 % in the budget of Kiev; 3) to extend powers of local communities for imposition of new local taxes and charges and their administration; 4)to establish compulsory contributions for health care in environmentally unfriendly regions; 5) to stimulate development of small and medium business by elaboration and implementation of local budgetary programs and their support; to legislate against practice of subventions in Ukraine and restrict transfers of other types.
Suggested Citation
Petro Borovyk & Oleksandr Rolinskyy & Kateryna Mazur, 2015.
"Domestic Practice and Foreign Experience of Budget Relations on the Level of Local Budgets,"
Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 51-57, March.
Handle:
RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2015:i:1:p:51-57
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2015:i:1:p:51-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.