Author
Abstract
"In eastern Germany the western German rehabilitation and vocational training systems were adopted. This process is not taking place without adjustment problems. Thus for example the possibilities for further training and retraining in the framework of occupational rehabilitation continue to be utilised considerably less frequently. In this article the reasons for this adjustment problem are shown based on the results of statistical analyses and a qualitative survey among specialists in occupational rehabilitation; these reasons are the more limited offer of occupational rehabilitation opportunities in eastern Germany, a different group of people (e.g. age structure), the limitation of the offer of further training and retraining resulting from the labour market situation and the changes in the support conditions, the mobility behaviour of those undergoing rehabilitation in eastern Germany as well as the hindrances in the rehabilitation procedure itself. The results of a representative survey of people undergoing rehabilitation who participated in further training or retraining measures as a part of their occupational rehabilitation provide information concerning their situation during the occupational rehabilitation, for example regarding the course and duration of the counselling and decision process. In most cases it took up to a year before it was possible to begin with the training course; this period was as long as two years for a considerable number of those interviewed (40%). The majority of those interviewed wish to have more options open to them in the decision for a certain training course. Most of those interviewed were satisfied with the implementation of the further training or retraining course. For a large number of those in rehabilitation, various problems and conflicts, especially the uncertain prospects of employment, were a burden during the training course. Most of those interviewed judged their prospects of employment following the course of further training or retraining ambivalently.The empirical findings obtained altogether in the research project and the current rehabilitation-policy debate surrounding the further development of occupational rehabilitation make up the background for proposals for innovative design of offers of further training and retraining for those undergoing rehabilitation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:30:i:2:p:269-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.