Author
Abstract
Even though economic influences are basically positive, it has not been possible to offer each young person capable of training a position in an enterprise. Only every second applicant being supervised by the Federal Employment Agency ends up taking part in in-house occupational training. In particular the number of 'old' applicants, that is, young people who have been trying to find a training position for a year or longer without success, has remained constant. This paper examines whether a training bonus might be the right way to improve this 'undesirable' situation. It deals with the problems that arise in connection with in-house cost-benefit calculations, the determination of training position quotas, and the expected effects of financial incentives. The paper comes to the conclusion that - in comparison to general and overall approaches - the connecting of additional training positions with a target group orientation can be evaluated positively, despite the possible negative pro-cyclic side-effects that can ensue from a bonus. According to the authors, a training bonus can indeed help 'old' applicants but is not suitable to combat the causes of the problems on the labour market which result from the categorisation of youthful 'old applicants' as 'under-performing'. Under-performance can be a result of influential factors in the family, school or social environment. 'It is a question of finding the appropriate adjustment screws in order to guarantee that the new generation is one of performers.' (IAB)
Suggested Citation
Dietrich, Hans & Dietz, Martin & Stops, Michael & Walwei, Ulrich, 2008.
"Ausbildungsmarkt: Bonus als Entspannungsmittel (The training market: Bonuses to relax the situation),"
IAB-Forum, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 2008(2), pages 66-69.
Handle:
RePEc:iab:iabfor:v:2008:i:2:p:066-069
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfor:v:2008:i:2:p:066-069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.