IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hyp/journl/v4y2016i2p45-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Practice of Insuring and Evaluating Performance Indicators and Quality for Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana PASCHIA

    („1st of December 1918” University of Alba Iulia)

Abstract

If 20-30 years ago the graduate of the educational institution had at his disposal 3-5 years to adapt to the concrete conditions of the enterprise or organization where he was directed to work, today employers insist on a quick insertion of the graduates into the labour market. In this paper we examine practices and benchmarks for performance appraisal of higher education institutions in Romania. Based on the results of the evaluations carried out we conclude that the best practice of those examined is the European orientation on the implementation of the European-agreed recommendations, instruments and indicators. We also find that a sufficiently elevated level of standardization has not been reached until now, so doubts about the conformity of the assessment with reality are not yet fully eliminated. Also, the lack of statistical data and the lack of agreement on a fundamental set of indicators only amplifies the relativity of judgments at this stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana PASCHIA, 2016. "The Practice of Insuring and Evaluating Performance Indicators and Quality for Higher Education," Hyperion Economic Journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Hyperion University of Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(2), pages 45-53, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:hyp:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:45-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hej.hyperion.ro/articles/2(4)_2016/HEJ%20nr2(4)_2016_A5Paschia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hyp:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:45-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iulian Panait (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fehypro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.