Chancellor Schröder, the SPD, and Agenda 2010
In March 1993, Chancellor Schröder announced that cutbacks to the social welfare system were necessary to improve the ?nancial and economic situation of the country. His program, proclaimed as Agenda 2010, covered ?nance, labor market, unemployment insurance, health, and pension reforms. It received the reluctant support of the SPD and the Greens. But the trade unions and the SPD’s left wing denounced the neoliberal program and urged, in vain, that left-Keynesian measures be taken to ameliorate the cutbacks. Adoption of Agenda 2010 has sparked protest demonstrations and weakened the SPD in numerous elections. It may produce the party’s defeat in the 2006 national election. The article tests the theory that welfare cutbacks will have negative electoral consequences for any party in power and suggests that the Schröder government should seriously consider adopting left-Keynesian proposals for a revised Agenda 2010 in order to reduce the steep income di?erentials.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 21 (2004)
Issue (Month): ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 49 40 42838-4457
Fax: 49 40 42838-6329
Web page: http://www.uni-hamburg.de/fachbereiche-einrichtungen/fb03/ise/index.html
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:21:y:2004:p:543-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew Braham)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Matthew Braham to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.