IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

William S. Burroughs' William Tell Routine: the Birth of the Possessed Reporter from a Staged Accidental Death

  • Alexander Klose

    (Rungestra├če, Berlin, Germany)

Registered author(s):

    In order to become a writer William S. Burroughs, the author of Junky and Naked Lunch, had to shoot his wife. That is what the myth says. In this article, I will demonstrate how the scandal of a contingent event - the negligent shooting of a woman while drunk - had to be transformed into a kind of conspiratorial plot in order to erect the image of a modern Orpheus. Contingency could be called the primary scandal of philosophy. It can be shown how even a scandalous author such as Burroughs need to banish contingency - through repetition of the mythological scheme of a man who is innocently responsible for the tragic death of his wife - to constitute himself as a writer. By adapting common myths Burroughs brings these myths into a new, outrageous form, and thereby installs a new set of values.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Institute of SocioEconomics in its journal Homo Oeconomicus.

    Volume (Year): 19 (2002)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages: 215-224

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:19:y:2002:p:215-224
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146 Hamburg
    Phone: 49 40 42838-4457
    Fax: 49 40 42838-6329
    Web page: http://www.uni-hamburg.de/fachbereiche-einrichtungen/fb03/ise/index.html

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:19:y:2002:p:215-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew Braham)

    The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Matthew Braham to update the entry or send us the correct address

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.