IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hom/homoec/v16y1999p219-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power in Game Forms

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas R. Mille

    (Department of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA)

Abstract

This essay defines power in game forms in what I believe to be a plausible and natural manner. It distinguishes between the affirmative and preclusive "faces" of power and identifies general properties that characterize all power relations (and all game forms). It also identifies certain special properties that may characterize some power relations (and some game forms). It defines "effective" preference in a manner similar to "domination" in the sense of cooperative game theory. And finally it asks this question: what conditions on power relations assure that, even as preferences may change, effective preference has "nice" properties such that society can make collective decisions easily. The answer is this: if there are three or more possible outcomes, and if no actor has all the power, it is impossible to structure power in such a way that effective preference has "nice" properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas R. Mille, 1999. "Power in Game Forms," Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 16, pages 219-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:16:y:1999:p:219-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:16:y:1999:p:219-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohamde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.