Author
Listed:
- Aoife Conway
- Deirdre Harkin
- Assumpta Ryan
- Paul Slater
Abstract
BackgroundThe Dementia Attitude Scale (DAS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring attitudes towards dementia, yet there is some debate about its factor structure, as deviations from the suggested two-factor model have been observed and alternative structures have been proposed. This study aimed to analyse and compare the different factor structures of the DAS and examine the consistency of these structures over time.MethodsA cross-sectional series design was used to collect longitudinal data from a census of nursing students over a 2-year period. The DAS was administered at three time points (Time Point 1 [baseline]: n = 247; Time Point 2 [Year 1]: n = 239; Time Point 3 [Year 2]: n = 216). Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS, and structural equation modelling was performed in JASP to assess structural validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the DAS and on each alternative structure proposed at each time point to evaluate fit and stability.ResultsThe findings indicated that the two-factor model demonstrated the best fit and stability across all time points, suggesting it is the most effective model for capturing the DAS constructs within this population. Reliability analysis showed that the two-factor model maintained strong internal consistency for ‘dementia knowledge’ and ‘social comfort’.ConclusionThe DAS provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of educational interventions, enabling educators to identify and address areas where students may require additional support. This study highlights the need for future research to explore the translation of these shifts into clinical behaviours, as well as the cultural and contextual factors influencing attitudes towards dementia.
Suggested Citation
Aoife Conway & Deirdre Harkin & Assumpta Ryan & Paul Slater, 2026.
"Exploring the Application of the Dementia Attitude Scale and Evaluating Its Factor Structure and Stability in Nurse Education,"
Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2026, pages 1-13, February.
Handle:
RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:9845911
DOI: 10.1155/nrp/9845911
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:9845911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.