IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlnrp/7893018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of Video-Based Assessment Checklists of Nursing Skills via Chest-Mounted Cameras for Home-Visiting Nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Sotaro Shimada
  • Toshiaki Takahashi
  • Aya Kitamura
  • Masaru Matsumoto
  • Yuko Mugita
  • Hiromi Sanada
  • Gojiro Nakagami

Abstract

IntroductionEnsuring that home-visiting nurses (HVNs) possess adequate skills for providing appropriate care is crucial in the context of increasing service demand with advanced care needs. However, current quality assurance relies on mentors’ subjective assessments during accompanying visits, which are burdensome and rater-dependent. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability and concurrent validity of objective video-based assessment (VBA) checklists for HVNs’ nursing skills, focusing on peripheral intravenous catheter placement, pressure injury care, defecation care, and skin tear care to reduce the burden of skill assessment at home and ensure valid skill assessments.MethodsThe checklists were developed through a literature review, focus group interviews, and a group meeting using the nominal group technique to ensure content validity. The inter- and intrarater reliabilities and concurrent validity of the checklists were evaluated using videos of nurses providing care to simulated patients. Five nursing researchers with experience in mentoring nurses assessed the videos twice using checklists with a washout period. The inter- and intrarater reliabilities were analyzed using Gwet’s AC1 statistics. Concurrent validity was evaluated with sensitivity and specificity of assessment using checklists against raters’ subjective assessments, with expertise in nursing skills as the gold standard.ResultsThe checklists demonstrated substantial to almost perfect inter- and intrarater reliabilities (AC1: 0.63–1.00) for each item. The overall assessments also showed more than substantial inter- and intrarater reliabilities (AC1: 0.72–1.00). The sensitivity and specificity of the checklists were both above 0.90, indicating high concurrent validity.ConclusionThe checklists were reliable and valid for objectively assessing HVNs’ skills. The VBA suggests feasible and cost-effective methods for quality assurance, potentially improving the quality of home care. Further studies with patients in diverse clinical settings are required to enhance the generalizability of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotaro Shimada & Toshiaki Takahashi & Aya Kitamura & Masaru Matsumoto & Yuko Mugita & Hiromi Sanada & Gojiro Nakagami, 2025. "Development and Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of Video-Based Assessment Checklists of Nursing Skills via Chest-Mounted Cameras for Home-Visiting Nurses," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2025, pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:7893018
    DOI: 10.1155/nrp/7893018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2025/7893018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2025/7893018.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/nrp/7893018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:7893018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.